嘿,我想小Tom可不会认为这是他俩相亲相爱、心心相印的证明,估摸着对哈利要更加防备了吧。好啦,接下去就端茶准备看好戏了。 又,那个食死徒(除了斯内普)没有守护神的说法是来自罗琳本人。不过看看原始的访谈,其实我觉得解释的合情合理,并且也留有余地。和你文中的设定也并不冲突啦。 Samantha: Was snape the only death eater who could produce a full patronus J.K. Rowling: Yes, because a Patronus is used against things that the Death Eaters generally generate, or fight alongside. They would not need Patronuses.
网友:fuyubi 打分:2 [2012-03-14 22:17:49]
嘿,我想小Tom可不会认为这是他俩相亲相爱、心心相印的证明,估摸着对哈利要更加防备了吧。好啦,接下去就端茶准备看好戏了。
又,那个食死徒(除了斯内普)没有守护神的说法是来自罗琳本人。不过看看原始的访谈,其实我觉得解释的合情合理,并且也留有余地。和你文中的设定也并不冲突啦。
Samantha: Was snape the only death eater who could produce a full patronus
J.K. Rowling: Yes, because a Patronus is used against things that the Death Eaters generally generate, or fight alongside. They would not need Patronuses.
[1楼] 作者回复 [2012-03-16 14:48:13]
唉,坑爹的罗琳阿姨啊~~这年代是无法考证了,连咒语也是了= =
[投诉]